Pentagon Failed To Get GAO Report's Major Conclusions Changed

As noted below, when The Washington Post reported on a draft last week of the Government Accountability Office report indicating pessimism about Iraq, the White House balked at the conclusions and the Pentagon reportedly pushed to get some of its conclusions changed.

Now that we have the final GAO report, it's clear that neither the White House's displeasure nor whatever pressure the Pentagon exerted on the GAO succeeded in accomplishing this goal.

Just as the draft report did, the final report concluded that the Iraqi government had met only three of 18 benchmarks for political success.

The Pentagon did apparently manage to swing a couple small changes -- in the "partially met" category. The original draft said that only two benchmarks -- the formation of governmental regions and the allocation and expenditure of $10 billion for reconstruction -- had been "partially met."

The final report, by contrast, says that four benchmarks have been "partially met" -- the two above, plus two other security benchmarks, the chief one being the provision of three trained and ready brigades to support Baghdad operations.

Bottom line: The Pentagon failed to get the report's main conclusions changed.


Comments (5)

CT Voter wrote on September 4, 2007 2:54 PM:
Bottom line: The Pentagon failed to get the report's main conclusions changed.

Well, I'll take my good news where I can find it.

But what are the odds that traditional media reports the White House/Pentagon stenography?

Greg wrote on September 4, 2007 3:06 PM:

slim to none. this has been another edition of...

Rees wrote on September 4, 2007 3:32 PM:

Is anyone there to comfort Michael O'Hanlon? I'm worried about that guy...

CT Voter wrote on September 4, 2007 3:59 PM:
But what are the odds that traditional media reports the White House/Pentagon stenography?

Careful, there, Greg. I'd say the odds are excellent that the GAO report in its entirety gets vaporized.

And stenography 101 RULES!

gonzone wrote on September 5, 2007 8:54 AM:

A non-partisan GAO report?
Get thee behind me unbiased facts!
What do the "think tanks", the White House, and our liberal media all say (yes, it will be the same thing)?
To quote Friedman: suck on that, GAO report!

Post a comment

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Poll Tracker

View more polls »
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address