Robertson Endorses Rudy As Best Candidate To Defend Us From "Bloodlust" Of Islamic Terrorists
Pat Robertson -- yes, that Pat Robertson -- just endorsed Rudy at an event moments ago. Here's some video:
What about Rudy's views on abortion and gay rights? They don't matter, because, as Robertson says, "to me the overriding issue before the American people is the defense of our population from the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists." Translation: Rudy is the candidate most likely to deliver the holy war with Islam that I've coveted for so long.
Comments (15)
jeff Grunewald wrote on November 7, 2007 10:13 AM:A Christofascist saving us from Islamofascism.
That'll work.
The Rapture can't come too soon for some of us.
That is when
we'll be rid of these men
or not
benjoya wrote on November 7, 2007 10:16 AM:maybe when reverend(!) pat he pointed his finger at us as the cause of 9/11, he was really thanking us.
jvill wrote on November 7, 2007 10:22 AM:"To me the overriding issue before the American people is the defense of our population from the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists."
But what about the 60 million murdered blastocysts we've been told over the past few decades represents another Holocaust? The worst atrocity since Eve screwed over Adam (that bitch)? Aren't the blastocysts Americans too?
Man, it's hard keeping up with the Political Twister these guys play nowadays.
"Put your left hand on Islamofascism and your right foot on GodHatesFags..."
Richard L. Adlof wrote on November 7, 2007 10:29 AM:Old white guys who lie with every breath NEED to stick together.
Look for Bill O'Reiley's endorsement tomorrow.
Northern Observer wrote on November 7, 2007 10:39 AM:Patty Robinson is a heretic.
A biblical literalist and an apologist for mammon, he is no more a Christian then the 8th century BC hebrews were. Hell, he's less of a Christian than the 8th century hebrews were.
Can someone get the crack-pot Pat Robertson to explain why ALL of the 'natural' catastrophes and calamities that God has 'visited' on the U.S.A. since 9/11 have occurred in states and 'red' areas?
From 'worst forest fires' through 'worst drought' and 'worst hurricanes', all have seemingly been directed at those places who voted for the once 'compassionate conservatives' who are leading this nation to destruction.
Pat Robertson is part of this alliance with 'evil' forces that are plaguing us.
And, now, he is doing his part to try to saddle this nation with another practitioner of evil.
Shame on Pat Robertson...God will surely punish him for his sell-out to satanic forces.
biff diggerence wrote on November 7, 2007 10:40 AM:Rudy's perfect for us.
Bush-Jeezus on Methampetamine.
biff diggerence wrote on November 7, 2007 10:43 AM:escusa
Methamphetamine.
eric wrote on November 7, 2007 10:56 AM:I wish that some major country would have a revolution and we could go back to hating commies.
postxian wrote on November 7, 2007 11:28 AM:Rudy doesn't have views on abortion or gay rights. He simply says what he needs to say to the people he needs to elect him. I guess we have confirmation of what we knew all along with respect to Robertson--it's all about access to power.
ARG in Chicago wrote on November 7, 2007 11:54 AM:It seems that we may be moving toward identifying a "consensus candidate" on the Republican side. It's looking like Rudy is the choice for the neocon base. I wonder if/how Dick Cheney is secretly supporting him.
-- ARG
Hey Jerry!
Is it hot down there?
Rudy's adviser NormPod has a "hope and prayer" that we bomb Iran as soon as possible.
PatRob has a hope an prayer that Rudy is elected.
Too much neocon hopin' and prayin' for the wrong things.
I hope Rudy doesn't have a prayer.
jeffgee - here is some food for thought from Robert A. Baker...
"What happens when the same number of people pray for something as pray against it? How does God decide whose prayer to answer? Does the total number of people praying for or against something matter? How about the righteousness of the supplicants? Are positive prayers answered more frequently than negative ones? Does God take the positive ones and Satan the negative? Does the intensity of the praying have any effect on the outcome? Does the length of time one devotes to praying have any effect on the frequency with which one's prayers are answered? Do the words and phrases used in the prayer -- either positive or negative -- have any bearing on the success rate? Does the nature of the thing or things prayed for have any bearing on the prayer's success rate -- either positive or negative prayers? Why or why not??"
tom wrote on November 7, 2007 6:42 PM:Iahtollah Robertson and Imanutjobguliani make a lovely pair, maybe they can each whack their cajonnes on the way to hell, and leave this country alone to solve the problems that people like them created.
I don`t believe there are many people left that take these two whacko`s seriously, however I`m sure that the 20% that still think GWB can do no wrong will go along with anything they say.
May God bless America and deliver us from men like these, I`ve had enough, already.
